FROLICK v. CITY OF CARMEL WATER UTILITIES et al
JEFFREY FROLICK and JEFFREY D. FROLICK |
GREG HOLLANDER, BRUCE BUCKSOT, CITY OF CARMEL WATER UTILITIES and CITY OF CARMEL |
1:2019cv02362 |
June 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to BRUCE BUCKSOT, CITY OF CARMEL WATER UTILITIES, GREG HOLLANDER, CITY OF CARMEL. (CKM) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by P. Adam Davis on behalf of Plaintiff JEFFREY D. FROLICK. (Davis, P.) |
Filing 7 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to CITY OF CARMEL WATER UTILITIES. (Davis, P.) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to CITY OF CARMEL WATER UTILITIES. (Davis, P.) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to BRUCE BUCKSOT. (Davis, P.) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to GREG HOLLANDER. (Davis, P.) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET , filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY FROLICK. (Davis, P.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5477011) (Davis, P.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.