SEARCY v. SINGH et al
DARLA SEARCY |
PARAMJIT SINGH and GEORGETOWN LIQUOR, INC. |
1:2019cv02413 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by All Defendants.(Carr, David) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEORGETOWN LIQUOR, INC.. (Bush, Charles) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendants GEORGETOWN LIQUOR, INC., PARAMJIT SINGH. (Bush, Charles) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Ellis Bush, II on behalf of Defendants GEORGETOWN LIQUOR, INC., PARAMJIT SINGH. (Bush, Charles) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Carr on behalf of Defendants GEORGETOWN LIQUOR, INC., PARAMJIT SINGH. (Carr, David) |
Filing 5 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to GEORGETOWN LIQUOR, INC., PARAMJIT SINGH. (REO) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber K. Boyd on behalf of Plaintiff DARLA SEARCY. (Boyd, Amber) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DARLA SEARCY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5481279) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Boyd, Amber) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.