CHICAGO WINE COMPANY et al v. HOLCOMB et al
Dennis Neary, Devin Warner, Nancy Neary, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, Stan Springer, The Chicago Wine Company and CHICAGO WINE COMPANY |
DAVID COOK, ERIC HOLCOMB and CURTIS HILL |
1:2019cv02785 |
July 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial Conference, filed by Plaintiffs CHICAGO WINE COMPANY, DENNIS NEARY, NANCY NEARY, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, STAN SPRINGER, DEVIN WARNER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Continue Initial Pretrial Conference)(Epstein, Robert) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2019 10:30 AM (Eastern Time) in room #277, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 8/23/2019.(SWM) |
Filing 12 Notice of Initial Extension of Time to 09/23/2019 , filed by Defendants DAVID COOK, CURTIS HILL, ERIC HOLCOMB. (Garn, Jefferson) Modified on 8/23/2019 - Edited docket text to match document title(NAD). |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jefferson S. Garn on behalf of Defendants DAVID COOK, CURTIS HILL, ERIC HOLCOMB. (Garn, Jefferson) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, James Alexander Tanford hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. Corrected Notice (Tanford, James) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, James Alexander Tanford hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Tanford, James) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by James Alexander Tanford on behalf of Plaintiffs CHICAGO WINE COMPANY, DENNIS NEARY, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, STAN SPRINGER, DEVIN WARNER. (Tanford, James) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST against DAVID COOK, CURTIS HILL, ERIC HOLCOMB, filed by STAN SPRINGER, DEVIN WARNER, CHICAGO WINE COMPANY, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, DENNIS NEARY.(Epstein, Robert) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DAVID COOK, CURTIS HILL, and ERIC HOLCOMB. (DJH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James E. Porter, II on behalf of Plaintiffs Dennis Neary, Nancy Neary, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, Stan Springer, The Chicago Wine Company, Devin Warner. (Porter, James) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT , filed by Plaintiffs Dennis Neary, Nancy Neary, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, Stan Springer, The Chicago Wine Company, Devin Warner. (Epstein, Robert) Modified on 7/10/2019 - Edited text to match title of document(NAD). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert David Epstein on behalf of Plaintiffs Dennis Neary, Nancy Neary, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, Stan Springer, The Chicago Wine Company, Devin Warner. (Epstein, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAVID COOK, CURTIS HILL, ERIC HOLCOMB, filed by Nancy Neary, Stan Springer, Devin Warner, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, The Chicago Wine Company, Dennis Neary. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5516722) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Epstein, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.