WARE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
| GREGORY WARE |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY |
| 1:2019cv03043 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ELI LILLY AND COMPANY. (Ullman, Emily) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily S. Ullman on behalf of Defendant ELI LILLY AND COMPANY. (Ullman, Emily) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael X. Imbroscio on behalf of Defendant ELI LILLY AND COMPANY. (Imbroscio, Michael) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by GREGORY WARE. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY waiver sent on 7/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(NAD) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by GREGORY WARE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(NAD) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk to: Eli Lilly and Company. (NAD) |
Filing 4
ENTRY - GRANTING #2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISCUSSING ACTION, AND DIRECTING SERVICE. The filing fee for in forma pauperis litigants is $350.00. No payment is due currently; however, the $350.00 balance remains owing. At this time, the Court has not determined that the action must be dismissed pursuant to 1915(e) and therefore shall proceed. This ruling is without prejudice to the filing of a proper Rule 12 motion. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) requires the Court to order service for Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to Defendant Eli Lilly and Company in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the Complaint (Filing No. #1 ), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/29/2019. (NAD) Modified on 7/29/2019 - Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail (NAD).
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff GREGORY WARE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account Information, #2 Envelope). (MAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, filed by GREGORY WARE. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WARE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Michael X. Imbroscio |
| Represented By: | Emily S. Ullman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GREGORY WARE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
