NARMI v. XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.
JOHN A. NARMI |
XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC. |
1:2019cv03121 |
July 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Richard L Young |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff JOHN A. NARMI . (Logan, Paul) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Richards Doty on behalf of Defendant XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.. (Doty, Sarah) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC..(Shelby, Amanda) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah V. Bowers on behalf of Defendant XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.. (Bowers, Sarah) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/23/2019 01:30 PM in room #234, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/29/2019.(SWM) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC. identifying Corporate Parent XPO Logistics, Inc., Corporate Parent XPO CNW, Inc. for XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC... (Shelby, Amanda) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.. (Shelby, Amanda) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda L. Shelby on behalf of Defendant XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.. (Shelby, Amanda) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by JOHN A. NARMI. XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC. served on 7/29/2019. (Haskin, John) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC. (JRB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Anthony Logan on behalf of Plaintiff JOHN A NARMI. (Logan, Paul) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Haskin on behalf of Plaintiff JOHN A NARMI. (Haskin, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC., filed by JOHN A NARMI. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5546060) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Haskin, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: NARMI v. XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC. | |
Represented By: | Sarah Richards Doty |
Represented By: | Amanda L. Shelby |
Represented By: | Sarah V. Bowers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JOHN A. NARMI | |
Represented By: | John H. Haskin |
Represented By: | Paul Anthony Logan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.