PERRY v. TALBOT et al
| RODNEY S. PERRY, SR. |
| CURTIS BYNUM and PAUL TALBOT |
| 1:2019cv03519 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dkts. #6 and #10 , are granted. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) ("the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee."). The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/9/2019. (JDH)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RODNEY S. PERRY, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Statement)(JDH) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Originally docketed in 1:19-cv-3615-RLY-DLP) (JRB) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Tort Claim, filed by Plaintiff RODNEY S. PERRY, SR (Originally docketed in 1:19-cv-3615-RLY-DLP) (JRB) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of RODNEY S. PERRY, SR. (Originally docketed in 1:19-cv-3615-RLY-DLP) (JRB) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Originally docketed in 1:19-cv-3615-RLY-DLP), filed by Plaintiff RODNEY S. PERRY, SR. (JRB) Modified on 8/29/2019 (JRB). |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CURTIS BYNUM, PAUL TALBOT (Originally docketed in 1:19-cv-3615-RLY-DLP), filed by RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.(JRB) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail) (JRT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through September 18, 2019, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail) (JRT) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CURTIS BYNUM, PAUL TALBOT, filed by RODNEY S. PERRY, SR. (No fee paid with this filing) (AKH) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/21/2019) (AKH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
