KNOX-BEY v. VOLLMAR
| PARIS ELLIOTT KNOX-BEY and PARIS ELLIOTT KNOX |
| MARK VOLLMAR |
| 1:2019cv03535 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ENTRY GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND SCREENING COMPLAINT - The Court, having considered the above action and the matters that are pending, makes the following rulings: 1. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, #2 , is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to him refiling in state court. #1 (See Entry). Copy to Paris Elliott Knox-Bey via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/16/2019.(JDH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff, PARIS ELLIOTT KNOX-BEY. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARK VOLLMAR, filed by PARIS ELLIOTT KNOX-BEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Affidavit of Probable Cause for Arrest Without Warrant, #2 Exhibit 2 Freedom of Information Act request)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
