BOYD v. GALIPEAU
| VINCENT W. BOYD |
| GALIPEAU |
| 1:2019cv03618 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent GALIPEAU. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-CCS, State v Boyd, Cause No. 49G02-1602-F4-5247, #2 Exhibit B-Plea Agreement, State v Boyd, Cause No. 49G02-1602-F4-5247, #3 Exhibit C-PCR CCS, Boyd v State, Cause No. 49G02-1807-PC-023189, #4 Exhibit D-PCR Petition, Boyd v State, Cause No., #5 Exhibit E-PCR Court Order, Boyd v State, Cause No. 49G02-1807-PC-023189)(Roebel, Justin) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Amend the petition to the extent that the Court will consider both the original petition #1 and the supplement #4 when deciding whether to grant habeas corpus relief. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/18/2019 (dist made) (CBU)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin F. Roebel on behalf of Respondent GALIPEAU. (Roebel, Justin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - VINCENT W. BOYD's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 49G02-1602-F4-005247. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 9/16/19. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 10/18/19. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 11/8/19. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/11/2019.(NAD)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner VINCENT W. BOYD. (CKM) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner, VINCENT W. BOYD. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by VINCENT W. BOYD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Marion Superior Court records including Amended Information and Notice of Tender)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BOYD v. GALIPEAU | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: VINCENT W. BOYD | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: GALIPEAU | |
| Represented By: | Justin F. Roebel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
