TANDEM LABS INCORPORATED v. MCALEENAN et al
| TANDEM LABS, INCORPORATED and TANDEM LABS INCORPORATED |
| KENNETH CUCCINELLI, KEVIN MCALEENAN, KATHY A BARAN, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and KATHY A. BARAN |
| 1:2019cv03668 |
| August 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to KATHY A. BARAN, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, KEVIN MCALEENAN. (NAD) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by TANDEM LABS INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Corrected Summons)(Moreno, Marco) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against KATHY A. BARAN, MARK KOUMANS, KEVIN MCALEENAN, filed by TANDEM LABS INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Corrected Summons)(Moreno, Marco) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Marco Antonio Moreno on behalf of Plaintiff TANDEM LABS INCORPORATED. (Moreno, Marco) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KATHY A BARAN, KENNETH CUCCINELLI, KEVIN MCALEENAN, filed by TANDEM LABS, INCORPORATED. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5601938) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A-Denial from USCIS dated August 13, 2019)(Moreno, Marco) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
