POSEY v. SEVIER et al
Petitioner: ROBERT ERIC POSEY
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and MARK SEVIER
Case Number: 1:2019cv03763
Filed: September 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CCS, #2 Exhibit B - DA Dkt., #3 Exhibit C - DA Appellant's, #4 Exhibit D - DA Appellee's, #5 Exhibit E - DA Memo Decision, #6 Exhibit F - DA Pet for Reh'g, #7 Exhibit G - DA Pet. to Trans., #8 Exhibit H - PCR CCS, #9 Exhibit I - PCR Dkt., #10 Exhibit J - PCR Appellant's, #11 Exhibit K - PCR Appellee's, #12 Exhibit L - PCR Reply, #13 Exhibit M - PCR Memo Decision, #14 Exhibit N - PCR Pet. to Trans.)(Drum, Jesse)
September 20, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse R. Drum on behalf of Respondents ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, MARK SEVIER. (Drum, Jesse)
September 17, 2019 Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ROBERT ERIC POSEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDH)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - Robert Eric Posey's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 84D03-0907-FA-2166. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 09/23/2019. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 10/23/2019. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 11/13/2019. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Copy to Robert Eric Posey via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/13/2019.(JDH) Modified on 9/13/2019 (JDH).
September 5, 2019 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
September 4, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ROBERT ERIC POSEY. (Filing fee $5, receipt number IP066489) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: POSEY v. SEVIER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT ERIC POSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Represented By: Jesse R. Drum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK SEVIER
Represented By: Jesse R. Drum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?