KANDHOLA v. KNIGHT
IQPAL S. KANDHOLA |
WENDY KNIGHT |
1:2019cv03769 |
September 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Doris L Pryor |
James R Sweeney |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Receipt of one CD (Sealed Exh. H) re #8 NOTICE of Manual Filing, filed by Respondent WENDY KNIGHT, re #7 Return to Order to Show Cause. (Jones, Benjamin) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JDC) |
Filing 10 Amended RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary), filed by WENDY KNIGHT.. (Jones, Benjamin) Modified on 10/18/2019 (JDC). created link to #7 |
Filing 9 MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal #8 Notice (Other) , filed by Respondent WENDY KNIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Benjamin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Manual Filing, filed by Respondent WENDY KNIGHT, re #7 Return to Order to Show Cause. (Jones, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary), filed by WENDY KNIGHT.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Report of Conduct, #2 Exhibit A-1 Notice to Lay Advocate Anderson, #3 Exhibit A-2 Notice to Lay Advocate Voss, #4 Exhibit B-Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #5 Exhibit B-1-Notice to Lay Advocate, #6 Exhibit C-Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #7 Exhibit C-1 Notice to Lay Advocate Santiago, #8 Exhibit C-2 Notice to Lay Advocate Anguiano, #9 Exhibit C-3 Video Evidence Review, #10 Exhibit D-Facility Appeal, #11 Exhibit D-1 Facility Appeal Response, #12 Exhibit E-DOC Appeal, #13 Exhibit F-Disciplinary Code, #14 Exhibit G-Appendix)(Jones, Benjamin) |
Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by IQPAL S. KANDHOLA. (JDC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Myron Lane Jones on behalf of Respondent WENDY KNIGHT. (Jones, Benjamin) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted.( Show Cause Response due by 10/18/2019.) (Copy to Petitioner via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/6/2019.(JDC) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner IQPAL S. KANDHOLA. (REO) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by IQPAL S. KANDHOLA. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: KANDHOLA v. KNIGHT | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: IQPAL S. KANDHOLA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Myron Lane Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.