BOYKINS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
| DEADRIAN BOYKINS |
| CHRISTINA CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES and DUANE ALSIP |
| 1:2019cv03817 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of DEADRIAN BOYKINS; *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/18/2019. Copy Mailed/cc: Finance (CKM)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER - granting #7 Motion for Reconsideration ; The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Although the plaintiff is excused from prepayment, he still must pay the full $350.00 filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) ("the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee."). The Court will enter a separate collection order to facilitate payment. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/18/2019. (CKM)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DEADRIAN BOYKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a) (CKM) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twenty Dollars and Zero Cents ($20.00). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through October 11, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. After the initial partial filing fee is received, the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/18/2019. cc: Finance (CKM)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DEADRIAN BOYKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Offender Trust System Summary). (AKH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DUANE ALSIP, CHRISTINA CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, filed by DEADRIAN BOYKINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Grievance and Request for Interview documentation)(AKH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by DEADRIAN BOYKINS located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by DEADRIAN BOYKINS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
