HERZ v. INDIANAPOLIS HEBREW CONGREGATION, INC. et al
Plaintiff: CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Defendant: JUDGE JAMES JOVEN, INDIANAPOLIS HEBREW CONGREGATION, INC., DENNIS SASSO, GERALD BEPKO, DAVID F. HAMILTON and JAMES JOVEN
Case Number: 1:2019cv03930
Filed: September 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT - JUDGMENT - The Court having this day made its Order directing the entry of final judgment, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Copy to Carolyn Wendy Herz via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/22/2019.(JDH)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court finds that the orders making Plaintiff a restricted filer prevent her from litigating this case in this Court. Because Plaintiff cannot proceed, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. To prevent further abusive litigation by Plaintiff, this dismissal is with prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. (See Order). Copy to Carolyn Wendy Herz via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/22/2019.(JDH)
October 21, 2019 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #4 Order to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff CAROLYN WENDY HERZ. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(JDH)
September 26, 2019 Filing 5 Submission of State Court Record from Marion County in case number 49D11-1908-CT-035581. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) Modified on 9/26/2019 (REO).
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND STAY PROCEEDINGS - Until Plaintiff has satisfied her obligations both before the Seventh Circuit and before this Court, it is not possible for her to litigate her claims. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has through October 21, 2019 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed because restrictions have been imposed on her ability to file papers in all federal courts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, other than a response to this show cause order, Plaintiff is prohibited from delivering any documents to the Clerk for filing, and must not attempt to present materials or information to the Court in an indirect fashion, such as by sending a fax or an email to the Court or its personnel. To do so would be a violation of the orders of the Court of Appeals and of this Court. Any and all proceedings in this matter are STAYED until the Court acts, either upon Plaintiff's response to this order, or upon Plaintiff's failure to respond if no response is made. Copy to Carolyn Wendy Herz via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/19/2019.(JDH)
September 18, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
September 17, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Shelese M. Woods on behalf of Defendant DAVID F. HAMILTON. (Woods, Shelese)
September 17, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D11-1908-CT-035581, filed by DAVID F. HAMILTON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record complaint, appearance, and summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woods, Shelese)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HERZ v. INDIANAPOLIS HEBREW CONGREGATION, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUDGE JAMES JOVEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS HEBREW CONGREGATION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DENNIS SASSO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GERALD BEPKO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID F. HAMILTON
Represented By: Shelese M. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES JOVEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?