SHAUL v. ZATECKY et al
Plaintiff: JUSTIN SHAUL
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY, HIBBARD, WILSON, HANNAH and MISTY STAMPER
Case Number: 1:2019cv03962
Filed: September 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RECEIPT #IP066939 for partial filing fee in the amount of $102.65, paid by plaintiff. (AKH)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JUSTIN SHAUL.(JDH)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JUSTIN SHAUL located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JUSTIN SHAUL to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JDH)
October 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of One Hundred Two Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents ($102.65). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through October 28, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. After the initial partial filing fee is received, the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/1/2019. (JDC)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JUSTIN SHAUL. (JDH)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JUSTIN SHAUL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Prisoner Account; Offender Trust System Inquiry). (AKH)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against HANNAH, HIBBARD, MISTY STAMPER, WILSON, DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by JUSTIN SHAUL. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Request for Interviews; Offender Grievance; Signed letter; Offender Information Summary). (AKH) Modified on 9/20/2019 (AKH). (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/20/2019) (AKH). Modified on 9/20/2019 (AKH).
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JUSTIN SHAUL located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JUSTIN SHAUL to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAUL v. ZATECKY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HIBBARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HANNAH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MISTY STAMPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JUSTIN SHAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?