LAX v. VOLLMAR et al
CRYSTAL LAX |
CITY OF MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN BROOKE and MARK VOLLMAR |
1:2019cv04007 |
September 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Matthew P Brookman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; While in forma pauperis status allows the plaintiff to proceed without pre-payment of the $350.00 filing fee, the plaintiff remains liable for the full fees. Robbins v. Switzer, 104 F.3d 895, 898 (7th Cir. 1997) ("Unsuccessful litigants are liable for fees and costs and must pay when they are able."). No payment is due at this time. Plaintiff's complaint, Dkt. 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint WITHIN FORTY DAYS of the date of this order or final judgment shall be issued and she will lose her lawsuit for good. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/2/2019. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CRYSTAL LAX. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN BROOKE, CITY OF MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK VOLLMAR, filed by CRYSTAL LAX. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.