EINES v. PICKENS et al
| BRIAN EINES |
| CHRISTINA CONYERS, MCDUFFY and PICKENS |
| 1:2019cv04016 |
| September 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAC)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRIAN EINES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account Summary). (MAC)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against CHRISTINA CONYERS, MCDUFFY, PICKENS, filed by BRIAN EINES. (No fee paid with this filing). (MAC)
|
|
Filing 1
CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by BRIAN EINES located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by BRIAN EINES to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (MAC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
