FORD v. MYERS et al
Plaintiff: JERMAINE FORD
Defendant: MYERS and HOLLY CALHOUN
Case Number: 1:2019cv04040
Filed: September 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ON MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is GRANTED to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fifteen Dollars and Eighty-Three Cents ($15.83). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through November 25, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/25/2019. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
October 24, 2019 Filing 8 Submission of Letter Requesting Clarification on Consent, filed by Plaintiff JERMAINE FORD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope). (MAC)
October 18, 2019 Filing 7 Submission of Trust Summary Account, filed by Plaintiff JERMAINE FORD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through November 5, 2019, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT)
October 4, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JERMAINE FORD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH)
October 2, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT)
September 27, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
September 26, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JERMAINE FORD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
September 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HOLLY CALHOUN, MYERS, filed by JERMAINE FORD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FORD v. MYERS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MYERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOLLY CALHOUN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JERMAINE FORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?