LACY v. AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC.
DEREK I LACY and DEREK I. LACY |
AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC. |
1:2019cv04204 |
October 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC. identifying Corporate Parent AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC. for AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC... (McHone, Koryn) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC.. (McHone, Koryn) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Koryn Michelle McHone on behalf of Defendant AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC.. (McHone, Koryn) |
Filing 5 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC.. (AKH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew G. Jones on behalf of Plaintiff DEREK I LACY. (Jones, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMERICAN BUSINESS INSURANCE, INC., filed by DEREK I LACY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5674768) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Jones, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.