PLATO v. INDIANA STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
| ROBERT J. PLATO, JR. |
| D. J. HUYVAERT and INDIANA STATE PAROLE BOARD |
| 1:2019cv04254 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk to: D. J. HUYVAERT. (NAD) |
Filing 9
ORDER - On December 2, 2019, Plaintiff filed his amended complaint. [Dkt. #7 . At this time, the Court has not determined that the action must be dismissed pursuant to 1915(e) and therefore shall proceed. This ruling is without prejudice to the filing of a proper Rule 12 motion. Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) requires the Court to order service for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendant D.J. Huyvaert in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the amended complaint [Dkt. #7 , applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (See Other.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/13/2019.(NAD)
|
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Special Circumstances by ROBERT J. PLATO, JR. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Letter to Judge, #3 Envelope) (CKM) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against D. J. HUYVAERT, INDIANA STATE PAROLE BOARD, filed by ROBERT J. PLATO, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CKM) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis Dkt. #2 is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Three Dollars and Twenty- Nine Cents ($3.29). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is allotted FORTY DAYS from the entry of this Order within which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Plaintiff's Complaint, to the extent it alleges claims against Defendant Huyvaert, is dismissed without prejudice. The claims against the Indiana State Parole Board are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's amended complaint, should he choose to file such, must be filed WITHIN FORTY DAYS of the date of this order or final judgment shall enter and he will lose his opportunity to bring his claim good. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/19/2019. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
| Filing 6 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet and Notice of Upcoming Address Change, filed by Robert J. Plato. Copy/Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (NAD) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ROBERT J. PLATO, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT J. PLATO, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certification of Inmate Trust Fund Account, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D. J. HUYVAERT, INDIANA STATE PAROLE BOARD, filed by ROBERT J. PLATO, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Parole Violation Paperwork, #2 Exhibit - Notice of Tort Claim, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
