UNITED STATES et al v. HEALTHNET, INC.
1:2019cv04258 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. Section 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER granting 77 Motion to Hold Proposed Settlement is Reasonable and Dismiss Claims brought on behalf of the State. An appropriate order will be entered. ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*** Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/3/2022. (JDC) |
Filing 80 Order on Motions to Dismiss and Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement - Indiana's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 42 ), is granted. HealthNet's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 55 ), is denied as moot as to Count II and granted as to Count III of the Amended Complaint. Count I of Indiana's Complaint-in-Intervention 19 supersedes Count II of the Amended Complaint. Count III of the Relator's Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Relator's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, (ECF No. 61 ), is denied as moot. (See Order.). Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/30/2021. (BRR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: UNITED STATES et al v. HEALTHNET, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.