AMES v. HUTCHINSON et al
| XENA AMES |
| TAMYKA DICKERSON, ANTHONY CARR, DAVID MURTLAND and BARBARA HUTCHINSON |
| 1:2019cv04282 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| James R Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Serve the Complaint to Defendants. In sum, Ames must serve the Defendants with a summons and complaint within 90 days of the filing of her Complaint, and service must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, as explained above. ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*** (Copies to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 11/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 summons) (JDC)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Serve the Complaint to Defendants, filed by Plaintiff XENA AMES. (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTHONY CARR, TAMYKA DICKERSON, BARBARA HUTCHINSON, DAVID MURTLAND, filed by XENA AMES. (Filing fee $400, receipt number IP067035) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint for Employment Discrimination, #3 Exhibit B - EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #4 Exhibit C - Request for Workers Compensation, #5 Exhibit D - Charge of Discrimination)(AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
