DAVIDSON v. CTP CORPORATION et al
| JODI L. DAVIDSON |
| WESTAFF, CTP CORPORATION and WESTAFF INC. |
| 1:2019cv04327 |
| October 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Leslie Dent for WESTAFF INC. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 12/18/2019 (dist made) (CBU)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Detrachia M.N. Andre for WESTAFF INC. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 12/18/2019 (dist made) (CBU)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to WESTAFF INC.. (LAB) (JRB) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Attorney(s) Detrachia M.N. Andre to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5770729), filed by Defendant WESTAFF INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Detrachia M.N. Andre in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Moffatt, Michael) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Attorney(s) Leslie Dent to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5770714), filed by Defendant WESTAFF INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Leslie Dent in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Moffatt, Michael) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Moffatt on behalf of Defendant WESTAFF INC.. (Moffatt, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CTP CORPORATION. (Swider, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Swider on behalf of Defendant CTP CORPORATION. (Swider, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Wohlford on behalf of Defendant CTP CORPORATION. (Wohlford, Mark) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by CTP CORPORATION. CTP CORPORATION waiver sent on 10/31/2019. (Swider, David) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by WESTAFF INC.. WESTAFF INC. co/Leslie Dent waiver sent on 10/31/2019. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (CKM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to CTP CORPORATION and WESTAFF (JRB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and DIRECTING SERVICE - plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to CTP Corp., a Division of Tube Processing Corporation and to Westaff in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint (Filing No. 1), applicable forms ((a) Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service and Summons and (b)Waiver of Service of Summons)), and this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/31/2019. (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for assistance with recruiting counsel, filed by Plaintiff JODI L. DAVIDSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Defendant CTP CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CTP CORPORATION, WESTAFF, filed by JODI L. DAVIDSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Statement, #2 Envelope)(AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
