UNDERHILL v. KARDIS et al
RICKY UNDERHILL |
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, EMILY KARDIS, JOHN DOE #1, BOB TURNEY, YOVANNE SHEPHERD, JOHN DOE #2, VEDORA HINSHAW and JENNIFER GIBSON |
1:2019cv04410 |
October 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is GRANTED. Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/7/2019. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RICKY UNDERHILL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Offender Trust Transaction History, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LAURA BODKIN, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JENNIFER GIBSON, VEDORA HINSHAW, EMILY KARDIS, YOVANNE SHEPHERD, BOB TURNEY, DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by RICKY UNDERHILL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.