LUNSFORD v. ZATECKY
Petitioner: RONALD LUNSFORD
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Case Number: 1:2019cv04439
Filed: November 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2019 Filing 7 CLOSED JUDGMENT. Final Judgment - The Court now enters final judgment against the petitioner and in favor of the respondent. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/13/2019. (JDC)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Dismissing Habeas Corpus Action - On November 4, 2019, petitioner Ronald Lunsford filed this 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his 1996 conviction in Indiana state court. On November 12, 2019, the Court directed Mr. Lunsford to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Mr. Lunsford has failed to respond, and the time for doing so has passed. This action is therefore dismissed with prejudice as untimely and barred by 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). Final judgment shall enter consistent with this Order. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/13/2019. (JDC)
November 21, 2019 Filing 5 RECEIPT #IP067400 for habeas filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by petitioner. (AKH)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Directing Petitioner to Show Cause and Pay Filing Fee - It appears from the petition that Mr. Lunsford's one-year limitations period has expired. He pled guilty and was sentenced on September 9, 1996. He did not file a direct appeal, and he filed his post-conviction petition on July 26, 2016. Mr. Lunsford therefore shall have through December 6, 2019, to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. Additionally, Mr. Lunsford shall have through December 6, 2019, to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 11/12/2019. (JDC)
November 4, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
November 4, 2019 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RONALD LUNSFORD. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO)
November 4, 2019 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by RONALD LUNSFORD located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by RONALD LUNSFORD to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUNSFORD v. ZATECKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RONALD LUNSFORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?