COLLINS v. LEVIN et al
| DUSTIN ALLEN COLLINS |
| LESLEY LEVIN and BETH MCDANIEL KROUSE |
| 1:2019cv04444 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis Dkt. #2 is granted. Having screened the Complaint, however, it is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within forty (40) days of the date of this order. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, the dismissal will become with prejudice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/19/2019. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DUSTIN ALLEN COLLINS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(NAD) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DUSTIN ALLEN COLLINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Offender Transaction History, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BETH MCDANIEL KROUSE, LESLEY LEVIN, filed by DUSTIN ALLEN COLLINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
