RUSHING v. NWANNUNU et al
JOSEPH A. RUSHING |
JOHN NWANNUNU, E. FALCONER and M. KARNEZIUN |
1:2019cv04494 |
November 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER - The plaintiff's motion for Court assistance, dkt. #11 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is informed that the Court previously granted his motion to reconsider the assessment of an initial partial filling fee and issued a collection order to facilitate the payment of the filing fee.The clerk is directed to include a copy of docket entries #8 and #9 with the plaintiff's copy of this Order. The plaintiff is not required to take further action regarding the filing fee. The Court will screen his complaint in due course. Copies to Joseph A. Rushing via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/27/2019. (JDH) |
Filing 11 MOTION for court assistance, filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH A. RUSHING. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH) |
Filing 10 Letter from Joseph A. Rushing regarding filing fee. ***NOTE: Letter states check for $12.65 was enclosed, however, no check was included/found***. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (DWH) |
Filing 9 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of JOSEPH A. RUSHING, 895997 (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/6/2019. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (DWH) |
Filing 8 ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to reconsider the assessment of an initial partial filing fee, dkt. #7 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is not required to pay an initial partial filing fee because he does not have the resources to pay it (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/6/2019. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH A. RUSHING. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JOSEPH A. RUSHING. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH) |
Filing 5 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twelve Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents ($12.65). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through December 12, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/18/2019. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH A. RUSHING. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certification of Inmate Trust Fund Account and history, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E. FALCONER, M. KARNEZIUN, JOHN NWANNUNU, filed by JOSEPH A. RUSHING. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Requests for health care and interview, #2 Proposed Summons (Blank), #3 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.