GARY v. WRIGHT et al
| LOREN DAVID GARY |
| A. WRIGHT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and A. WATKINS |
| 1:2019cv04600 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to 2/27/2020 to either show cause why Judgment consistent with the screening Order should not issue or file an amended complaint which cures the deficiencies discussed in the screening Order. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/3/2020. (CBU)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to re-submit his complaint re #7 Entry Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Screening and Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff LOREN DAVID GARY. (NAD) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE re #6 Notice of Deficiency Submission of Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff LOREN DAVID GARY. (CKM) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and the Notice issued on 11/26/2019 #6 is rescinded. The complaint must be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. Mr. Gary shall have through 12/27/2019, in which to either show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue or file an amended complaint which cures the deficiencies discussed in this Entry. If Mr. Gary fails to respond to this order to show cause, the case will be dismissed in accordance with 28:1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, without further notice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/6/2019. (CBU)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through December 26, 2019, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (JRT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LOREN DAVID GARY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Prisoner Account).(AKH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, A. WATKINS, A. WRIGHT, filed by LOREN DAVID GARY. (No fee paid with this filing). (AKH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by LOREN DAVID GARY located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by LOREN DAVID GARY to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
