ERMI LLC v. PEACH
| ERMI LLC |
| CLYDE PEACH, JR. and CLYDE PEACH, JR. doing business as INDIANA BRACE CO INC. doing business as CLYDE PEACH LLC doing business as PEACH MEDICAL LLC |
| 1:2019cv04628 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT re #12 Closed Judgment entered In favor of ERMI LLC Against CLYDE PEACH, JR by ERMI LLC. (Dockins, Michael) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Final Determination in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Consent Judgment) (CKM) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT JUDGMENT - in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant ; Pursuant to the Stipulation, PLAINTIFF is entitled to recover from DEFENDANT the sum of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000), which represents ERMIs compensatory damages, statutory damages, enhanced damages for Defendants willful conduct, costs, and attorneys fees, which this Court grants under 15 U.S.C. 1117. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/27/2020. Copy Mailed.(CKM) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement , as to Plaintiff ERMI LLC, Defendant CLYDE PEACH, JR, filed by ERMI LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Stipulation for Entry of Final Judgment, #2 Exhibit B. Proposed Consent Judgment) (Dockins, Michael) |
| Filing 10 MARGINAL ENTRY granting IN PART Defendant's #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the complaint by February 21, 2020. Copy to Defendant via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/13/2019. (SWM) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Filing in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (CKM) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time for 90 days, filed by Defendant CLYDE PEACH, JR. (CKM) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service served on Clyde Peach, Jr. on 11-22-2019, filed by ERMI LLC. (Dockins, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CLYDE PEACH, JR. (REO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Michael E. Dockins hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Dockins, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ERMI LLC. (Dockins, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. Dockins on behalf of Plaintiff ERMI LLC. (Dockins, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLYDE PEACH, JR, filed by ERMI LLC. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5733920) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. US Pat. No. 6669660, #2 Exhibit 2. IBC TKE Knee Extender, #3 Exhibit 3. Photo of ERMI's Knee Extensionator, #4 Exhibit 4. Photo of ERMI Patent Marking, #5 Exhibit 5. Defendant Peach's Patent Apl. No. 13190028, #6 Exhibit 6. Notice of Cited References in Apl. No. 13190028, #7 Exhibit 7. IBC Website Home Page, #8 Exhibit 8. IBC Wegsite Page for Knee Extension Frame, #9 Exhibit 9. IBC Website Page for Terminal Knee Extender (TKE), #10 Exhibit 10. Notice of Abandonment for Pat Apl. No. 13190028, #11 Exhibit 11. IBC Website Page showing Current Users, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Proposed Summons)(Dockins, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
