WULAH v. AMERICOLLECT, INC.
| ROXANNE WULAH |
| AMERICOLLECT, INC. |
| 1:2019cv04913 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLOSED DISMISSED - MARGINAL ENTRY - Dismissal with prejudice acknowledged #10 . Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/27/2020.(JDH) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff ROXANNE WULAH. (Philipps, David) |
Filing 9
ORDER Directing Filing of Documents Authorizing Dismissal:The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences, and trial, if any, are VACATED. Within forty-five (45) days of the date of this entry, counsel for the Plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause and submit an order for the Court's signature ordering the dismissal of this action or a stipulation of dismissal (consistent with the agreement of the parties). Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 1/14/2020.(SWM)
|
| Filing 8 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to AMERICOLLECT, INC.. (AKH) (Main Document 6 replaced on 12/17/2019) (AKH). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff ROXANNE WULAH. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Angie K. Robertson on behalf of Plaintiff ROXANNE WULAH. (Robertson, Angie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary E. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff ROXANNE WULAH. (Philipps, Mary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff ROXANNE WULAH. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMERICOLLECT, INC., filed by ROXANNE WULAH. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5767702) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Indiana Secretary of State Corporate Information, #2 Exhibit B - NMLS State License Information, #3 Exhibit C - Attorney Representation/Dispute Letter, #4 Exhibit D - excerpts of Experian Credit Report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Philipps, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WULAH v. AMERICOLLECT, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ROXANNE WULAH | |
| Represented By: | Mary E. Philipps |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
| Represented By: | Angie K. Robertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMERICOLLECT, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
