ANDERSON v. WHEELER MISSION et al
| ANTAEUS ANDERSON |
| DIRECTOR, SECRETARY, WHEELER MISSION and HEAD OF MANAGEMENT |
| 1:2019cv04946 |
| December 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION For Transport, filed by Plaintiff ANTAEUS ANDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDC) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address for ANTAEUS ANDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JDC) |
| Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT. Final Judgment - Consistent with the Entry signed today, the Court now enters judgment in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff shall take nothing by his complaint, and this case is closed. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/13/2020.(JDC) |
| Filing 7 Entry - Federal law requires the Court to dismiss a case proceeding without prepayment of fees at any time if the court determines that... the action... fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted[.] 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court previously determined that Plaintiff failed to state any federal-law claim upon which relief may be granted and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies, if possible, within thirty days. Specifically, the Court determined that Plaintiff failed to state a claim for deprivation of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983 because he did not allege that the defendants, Wheeler Mission and its employees, acted under color of state law. The time allotted for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has passed, and Plain-tiff has filed a document which the Court construes as an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) That document contains no allegations tending to show that Wheeler Mission or its employees acted under color of state law. Plaintiffs federal-law claims are therefore dismissed on the merits with prejudice. Plaintiff also alleges state-law claims for defamation. Because federal courts should generally relinquish supple-mental jurisdiction over pendant state-law claims when all federal claims are dismissed, see Kennedy v. Schoenberg, Fisher & Newman, Ltd., 140 F.3d 716, 727 (7th Cir. 1998), Plaintiffs state-law claims are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to refiling in an appropriate state court. Final judgment will be entered separately. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/13/2020.(JDC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Argument For Amending Complaint, filed by Plaintiff ANTAEUS ANDERSON (JDC) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs state-law claims should also be dismissed. However, Plaintiff is allowed thirty days from the date of this order within which to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the time allotted, judgment will issue dismissing his 1983 claims on the merits and dismissing his state-law claims without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/31/2019. (JDC)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Manual Filing, flash drive containing video by ANTAEUS ANDERSON (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ANTAEUS ANDERSON. (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DIRECTOR, HEAD OF MANAGEMENT, SECRETARY, WHEELER MISSION, filed by ANTAEUS ANDERSON. (No fee paid with this filing). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
