JAY v. SAUL
| TODD JAMES JAY |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 1:2019cv05028 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - This cause is before the Court on Defendants First Motion for Enlargement of Time. The Court, being duly advised, now GRANTS Defendants motion #7 . Accordingly, Defendant is granted an enlargement of time, until March 16, 2020, to respond to Plaintiffs complaint. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/21/2020. (JDH)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 3/16/2020 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Alison) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alison T. Schwartz on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Schwartz, Alison) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by TODD JAMES JAY.(Hiller, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth R. Hiller on behalf of Plaintiff TODD JAMES JAY. (Hiller, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Local Rule 5-12(a), and by agreement with the United States Attorney, no actual service of initial process is required in Social Security appeals brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, unless otherwise ordered. The Social Security Administration will treat notification through the Court's Case Management and Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF) as service under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Clerk's Office will refrain from issuance of the submitted summons(es) unless otherwise ordered. (TEXT-ENTRY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by TODD JAMES JAY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5783321) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Hiller, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JAY v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL | |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Represented By: | Alison T. Schwartz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TODD JAMES JAY | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth R. Hiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
