NEIL ABDUL AZIZ BEY v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH et al
| TRAVIS NEIL ABDUL AZIZ BEY |
| TD BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK, UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY, AES, STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES CORPORATION, PFFCU BANK, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, EQUIFAX, VERIZON WIRELESS, ASCENDIUM EDUCATION SOLUTIONS, XFINITY CORPORATION, UNITED STATES UNIFORMED SERVICES CORPORATION, TRANSUNION, STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICHLES CORPORATION, STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICHLES CORPORATION, VERIZON FIOS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EXPERIAN and NAVIENT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LOAN SERVICING CORPORATION |
| 1:2019cv05046 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CLOSED JUDGMENT - FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 58 - For the reasons set forth in the Courts Order entered this day, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT and DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Copy to Travis Neil Abdul Aziz Bey via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/29/2020.(JDH)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER - On December 27, 2019, Plaintiff Travis Neil Abdul Aziz Bey filed a Complaint in this matter, [Filing No. 1], which the Court screened and dismissed without prejudice, [Filing No. 3]. In its January 2, 2020 Order, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint on or before January 16, 2020 to address the noted deficiencies. [Filing No. 3 at 1.] The Court stated that [f]ailure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff neither filed an Amended Complaint by the January 16, 2020 deadline nor sought an extension of that deadline. Therefore, final judgment will now issue dismissing this matter. Copy to Travis Neil Abdul Aziz Bey via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/29/2020.(JDH)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER - The Court ORDERS Mr. Bey to file an Amended Complaint by January 16, 2020. The Court also notes that Mr. Bey did not pay the $400 filing fee, nor did he file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, when he filed his Complaint. When Mr. Bey files his Amended Complaint, he must either pay the $400 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this case. (See Order). Copy to Travis Neil Abdul Aziz Bey via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/2/2020.(JDH)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AES, ASCENDIUM EDUCATION SOLUTIONS, EQUIFAX, EXPERIAN, NAVIENT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LOAN SERVICING CORPORATION, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, PFFCU BANK, STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICHLES CORPORATION, STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICHLES CORPORATION, STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES CORPORATION, TD BANK, TRANSUNION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY, UNITED STATES UNIFORMED SERVICES CORPORATION, VERIZON FIOS, VERIZON WIRELESS, WELLS FARGO BANK, XFINITY CORPORATION, filed by TRAVIS NEIL ABDUL AZIZ BEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
