IN THE MATTER OF NON-PARTY SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO DANIEL J. BECKMAN, M.D.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District IN THE MATTER OF NON-PARTY SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO DANIEL J. BECKMAN, M.D.

IN THE MATTER OF NON-PARTY SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO DANIEL J. BECKMAN, M.D.

Case Number:	1:2019mc00063
Filed:	October 10, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	No cause code entered

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2019	Filing 22 ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE: At issue before the Court is whether Daniel J. Beckman, M.D. is entitled to payment of a witness fee beyond the $40 statutory amount set in 28 U.S.C. § 1821 for his subpoenaed attendance at a deposition as a lay witness in an employment discrimination case. Dr. Beckman has not been identified as an expert witness and is not te stifying as a treating physician. He is a fact witness. Dr. Beckman is only entitled to collect the statutory amount of $40 for his attendance at a deposition as a fact wi tness in this matter. Because Dr. Beckman has not presented any evidence of mileage expenses (his deposition will occur at his place of employment), the Court does not include any such expenses in calculating his witness fee. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/4/2019.(SWM)
October 10, 2019	Filing 17 ORDER denying Daniel J. Beckman, M.D.'s 1 Motion to Quash. Counsel for both sides shall confer to schedule the deposition in Indianapolis, at a location and time convenient for Beckman at his earlies t convenience within the next 45 days. Requests for production are limited as described in this order. Beckman is entitled to a reasonable witness fee, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. Holland's request for costs is denied. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/10/2019. (SWM)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2019

Filing 22 ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE: At issue before the Court is whether Daniel J. Beckman, M.D. is entitled to payment of a witness fee beyond the $40 statutory amount set in 28 U.S.C. § 1821 for his subpoenaed attendance at a deposition as a lay witness in an employment discrimination case. Dr. Beckman has not been identified as an expert witness and is not te stifying as a treating physician. He is a fact witness. Dr. Beckman is only entitled to collect the statutory amount of $40 for his attendance at a deposition as a fact wi tness in this matter. Because Dr. Beckman has not presented any evidence of mileage expenses (his deposition will occur at his place of employment), the Court does not include any such expenses in calculating his witness fee. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/4/2019.(SWM)

October 10, 2019

Filing 17 ORDER denying Daniel J. Beckman, M.D.'s 1 Motion to Quash. Counsel for both sides shall confer to schedule the deposition in Indianapolis, at a location and time convenient for Beckman at his earlies t convenience within the next 45 days. Requests for production are limited as described in this order. Beckman is entitled to a reasonable witness fee, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. Holland's request for costs is denied. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/10/2019. (SWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IN THE MATTER OF NON-PARTY SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO DANIEL J. BECKMAN, M.D.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?