NAPIER v. WARE et al
JAMES B. NAPIER |
RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and RENEE WARE |
1:2020cv00071 |
January 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James Alex Emerson on behalf of Defendants RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENEE WARE. (Emerson, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew L. Hinkle on behalf of Defendants RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENEE WARE. (Hinkle, Matthew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk to 1) Officer Renee Ware (JDC) |
Filing 8 ENTRY GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS - Pending before the Court are Plaintiff James B. Napiers construed Complaint, [Filing No. 1], and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, [Filing No. 5]. The Court previously ordered Mr. Napier to file a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement (or institutional equivalent) in support of his Motion, [Filing No. 6], and Mr. Napier has now done so, [Filing No. 7].1 This Entry addresses Mr. Napiers Motion, screens his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), and directs service of process. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/14/2020. (JDC) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to Court #6 Order to Show Cause with Submission of Trust Statement, filed by Plaintiff JAMES B. NAPIER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Trust Account, #2 Envelope)(JDH) |
Filing 6 ORDER - The Court ORDERS Mr. Napier to SHOW CAUSE by February 10, 2020 why his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, [Filing No. 5], should not be denied for failure to file a certified copy of his trust fund account statement. In responding to this Order, Mr. Napier must file a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6-month period prior to January 8, 2020 (the date he filed his Complaint). (See Order). Copy to James B. Napier via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/27/2020.(JDH) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JAMES B. NAPIER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDH) |
Filing 3 ENTRY - Plaintiff has filed a Tort Claim Notice and a letter the Court has construed as a Complaint without paying the filing fee. Plaintiff shall have through January 31, 2020 in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so by submitting an affidavit setting forth the assets he possesses and indicating that he is unable to prepay the fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Should Plaintiff seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fees, he shall use the form attached to this Entry. The failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice without further notice. Copies to James B. Napier via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Form - IFP)(JDH) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JAMES B. NAPIER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDH) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENEE WARE, filed by JAMES B. NAPIER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.