REAVES v. SHAW et al
| KOREY REAVES |
| SHAW, MILLS, UNNAMED and LOVEALL |
| 1:2020cv00259 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLOSED ENTRY GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING ACTION - Plaintiff moves the Court to withdraw his complaint, filed on January 23, 2020, dkt. #2 , without prejudice. See dkt. 2. The complaint has not been screened, nor have the defendants appeared in this action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion to withdraw complaint, treated as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), dkt. #8 , is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice. No judgment is necessary under these circumstances. Id. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/19/2020. (DWH) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw Complaint Without Prejudice, filed by Plaintiff KOREY REAVES. (JDH) |
Filing 7
ORDER on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Ten Dollars and Thirty-Five Cents ($10.35). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through February 27, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding months income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiffs custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/31/2020. (DWH)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 4 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support, re #2 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff KOREY REAVES. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff KOREY REAVES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Prisoner Account; Offender Trust System Offender Detail Inquiry). (AKH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against LOVEALL, MILLS, SHAW, UNNAMED, filed by KOREY REAVES. (No fee paid with this filing).(AKH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by KOREY REAVES located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by KOREY REAVES to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
