LYONS v. MORRIS et al
| CHRISTINA G. LYONS |
| WILLIAM R. MORRIS, JR. and INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED |
| 1:2020cv00265 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58 - The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/25/2020.(NAD) |
Filing 9
ENTRY DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - On February 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint (Filing No. #8 ), and having again pled the same deficient allegations, she has failed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for a lack of diversity jurisdiction among the parties, and no federal claims being alleged. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the screening Entry (Filing No. #7 ), this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will be issued under separate order. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/25/2020.(NAD)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, WILLIAM R. MORRIS, JR, filed by CHRISTINA G. LYONS.(NAD) |
|
Filing 7
ENTRY - GRANTING #2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SCREENING AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. For the reasons stated above, Lyons' Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Filing No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Lyons is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than Friday, February 18, 2020. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/28/2020. (NAD)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:20-cv-00265-TWP-MJD, on all future filings in this matter. (AKH) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Clerk is directed to reassign case to Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore for all further proceedings. This case is related to 1:19-cv-04221-TWP-MJD. Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/28/2020. (TRG)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Motion to Consolidate Actions, filed by Plaintiff CHRISTINA G. LYONS (NAD) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, CHRISTINA G. LYONS. (Attachments: #1 Benefit Amount)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, WILLIAM R. MORRIS, JR, filed by CHRISTINA G. LYONS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Motion for Continuance, #2 Exhibit 2 docket event, #3 Exhibit 3 Notice of Small Claims, #4 Exhibit 4 Notice of Contested Hearing and Motion to Continue, #5 Exhibit 5 Motion to Continue, #6 Exhibit 6 Transport Order, #7 Exhibit 7 Final Report)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
