WOODS v. SEVIER et al
JERLIJAH WOODS |
GEORGE ZOLEY, NELSON, FITCH, MARK SEVIER and ROBERT CATER |
1:2020cv00282 |
January 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RECEIPT #IP068854 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $12.47, paid by Plaintiff. (REO) |
Filing 9 MOTION to preserve evidence, filed by Plaintiff JERLIJAH WOODS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH) |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Plaintiff JERLIJAH WOODS. (Attachments: #1 attachment, #2 Envelope)(JDC) |
Filing 6 Submission of Signature required of dkt #1 , filed by Plaintiff JERLIJAH WOODS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDC) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JERLIJAH WOODS. (Attachments: #1 attachment, #2 Envelope)(JDC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 27, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by US Mail. (MEH) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT CATER, FITCH, NELSON, MARK SEVIER, GEORGE ZOLEY, filed by JERLIJAH WOODS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Report of Conduct dated 8/3/18, #2 Exhibit B - Informal Request dated 9/9/19, #3 Exhibit C - Request for Interview dated 9/23/19, #4 Exhibit D - Request for Interview to Sevier dated 10/7/19, #5 Exhibit E - Request for Interview to Winningham dated 10/7/19, #6 Exhibit F - Request for Health Care dated 11/6/19, #7 Exhibit G - Request for Interview dated 11/3/19, #8 Exhibit H - Return of Grievance dated 10/31/19, #9 Exhibit I - Return of Grievance dated 11/13/19, #10 Exhibit J - Request for Interview dated 11/12/19, #11 Exhibit K - Request for Interview dated 11/13/19, #12 Exhibit L - Return of Grievance dated 11/13/19, #13 Exhibit M - Request for Interview to Grinstead dated 11/14/19, #14 Exhibit N - Request for Interview to Nelson dated 11/14/19, #15 Exhibit O - Request for Interview dated 11/17/19, #16 Exhibit P - Request for Interview to Fitch dated 11/24/19, #17 Exhibit Q - Request for Interview to Sevier dated 11/14/19, #18 Exhibit R - Request for Interview to Winningham dated 11/24/19, #19 Exhibit S - Request for Health Care dated 11/26/19, #20 Exhibit T - Request for Interview to Winningham dated 11/25/19, #21 Exhibit U - Request for Health Care dated 11/26/19, #22 Exhibit V - Request for Interview to French dated 12/10/19, #23 Exhibit W - Request for Interview to Winningham dated 12/11/19, #24 Exhibit X - Request for Interview to Winningham dated 12/11/19, #25 Exhibit Y - Letter to Plaintiff from Neal Fetz dated 1/9/20, #26 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.