DARKO VENTURES LLC-S SERIES 101 v. ROSS et al
| DARKO VENTURES LLC-5 SERIES 101 and DARKO VENTURES LLC-S SERIES 101 |
| US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, LLOYD A. ROSS and JOHN DOE/MARY DOE |
| 1:2020cv00415 |
| February 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER - granting #13 Motion for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants #7 Motion to Dismiss is enlarged to, through and including April 27, 2010. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/30/2020. (CKM) Modified on 3/31/2020 - Added link to #7 (NAD).
|
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Enlargement of Time to respond to #7 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Plaintiff DARKO VENTURES LLC-S SERIES 101. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Enlargement of Time)(Berkshire, Jynell) Modified on 3/30/2020 - Added link to #7 (NAD). |
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Enlargement of Time, filed by Plaintiff DARKO VENTURES LLC-S SERIES 101. (Berkshire, Jynell) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER - granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to 4/27/2020 re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/25/2020. (NAD)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to April 27, 2020 re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Plaintiff DARKO VENTURES LLC-S SERIES 101. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting EOT)(Ault, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew A. Ault on behalf of Plaintiff DARKO VENTURES LLC-S SERIES 101. (Ault, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. (Shields, Gina) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. (Shields, Gina) |
| Filing 6 Submission of state court records from Marion County, Case No. 49C01-1912-PL-052164. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting Defendant U.S. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service's #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 3/6/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 2/7/2020. (SWM)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 6, 2020 in which to #1 Notice of Removal Answer or Otherwise Plead, filed by Defendant US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shields, Gina) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gina M. Shields on behalf of Defendant US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. (Shields, Gina) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Circuit Court, case number 49C01-1912-PL-052164, filed by US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Appearance, Complaint, Publication, Summons, Return of Service, City of Indy Dismissal, Proof of Publication, #2 State Court Record Complaint to Quiet Title Real Estate, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shields, Gina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
