CRUZ v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. et al
| JOHNNIE CRUZ |
| FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and DONALD GULBAN |
| 1:2020cv00603 |
| February 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal in State Court by FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. (Milstone, James) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Milstone, James) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Milstone, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James H. Milstone on behalf of Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Milstone, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Decatur, case number 16C01-1912-CT-0736, filed by FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5874486) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Petition, #2 State Court Record Summons, Complaint, Appearance, Return of Service, Appearance, MET answer, Order grant MET, Answer to COmplaint, Suggestion of Death, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Milstone, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
