BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC v. THE MAD CRAB LLC
BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC |
THE MAD CRAB LLC |
1:2020cv00714 |
March 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
James R Sweeney |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER granting Defendant's #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 5/22/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 4/27/2020. (SWM) (Main Document 18 replaced on 4/27/2020) (SWM). |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to May 22, 2020 to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant THE MAD CRAB LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Drake, John) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting Parties' #15 Joint Motion to Continue Deadlines and Initial Pretrial Conference. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the April 27, 2020 initial pretrial conference is CONTINUED to June 3, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern). The proposed case management plan is due May 27, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 4/16/2020.(SWM) |
Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Continuance of Deadlines and Initial Pretrial Conference, filed by Defendant THE MAD CRAB LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Drake, John) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Initial Filing in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 complaint, #2 Exhibit) (JDC) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/27/2020 11:00 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the courts expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 3/30/2020.(SWM) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant THE MAD CRAB LLC. (Drake, John) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by THE MAD CRAB LLC. (Drake, John) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John A. Drake on behalf of Defendant THE MAD CRAB LLC. (Drake, John) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Exs. A-I, Appearance and Pro Hac Vice, Corporate Disclosures, and Magistrate Notice served on Jin Rong Dong on 03/06/2020, filed by BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC. (Klein, Steven) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Steven E. Klein for BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC added. The court FURTHER ORDERS that Steven E. Klein register as a user of the court's electronic case filing system by March 19, 2020. Failure to register could result in the revocation of his admission pro hac vice. Copy to Steven E. Klein via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 3/6/2020. (SWM) |
Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to THE MAD CRAB LLC. (REO) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC identifying Corporate Parent SINHDARELLA, INC., Corporate Parent RED CRAWFISH, INC for BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC.. (Guevara, Gregory) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney(s) Steven E. Klein to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5890494), filed by Plaintiff BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Steven E. Klein, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Guevara, Gregory) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip R. Zimmerly on behalf of Plaintiff BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC. (Zimmerly, Philip) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory W. Guevara on behalf of Plaintiff BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC. (Guevara, Gregory) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5890426) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - TBC Exteriors, #2 Exhibit B - TBC Interiors, #3 Exhibit C - TBC Menus, #4 Exhibit D - TBC Collateral, #5 Exhibit E - TBC Website, #6 Exhibit F - TBC Registrations, #7 Exhibit G - Infringing Marks, #8 Exhibit H - Infringing Menu, #9 Exhibit I - Infringing Trade Dress, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Proposed Summons)(Guevara, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC v. THE MAD CRAB LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BOILING CRAB FRANCHISE CO., LLC | |
Represented By: | Gregory W. Guevara |
Represented By: | Philip R. Zimmerly |
Represented By: | Steven E. Klein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: THE MAD CRAB LLC | |
Represented By: | John A. Drake |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.