LEMONS v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. et al
| BRADLEY LEMONS |
| ANTHONY WATTS and SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. |
| 1:2020cv00760 |
| March 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses, filed by All Defendants.(Pfleging, Lesley) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendants SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., ANTHONY WATTS. (Pfleging, Lesley) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. identifying Corporate Parent KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS, INC. for SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO... (Pfleging, Lesley) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Lesley A. Pfleging on behalf of Defendants SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., ANTHONY WATTS. (Pfleging, Lesley) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion County Superior Court, case number 49D03-2002-CT-006298, filed by ANTHONY WATTS, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5897112) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit : Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Record (Docket, Plaintiffs Appearance, Complaint, Summons, and Return of Service for Defendants))(Pfleging, Lesley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
