LYNN et al v. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
COURTNEY LYNN and CHRISTOPHER LYNN |
ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC |
1:2020cv00823 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Doris L Pryor |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 5/14/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 4/29/2020. (SWM) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to 05/14/2020 in which to #1 Complaint , filed by Defendant ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McKenna, Daniel) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC. (DJH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry Paul Smith on behalf of Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER LYNN, COURTNEY LYNN. (Smith, Larry) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Marco on behalf of Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER LYNN, COURTNEY LYNN. (Marco, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, filed by CHRISTOPHER LYNN, COURTNEY LYNN. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5905399) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Marco, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.