HOLMES v. STATE OF INDIANA
PATRICK HOLMES |
STATE OF INDIANA |
1:2020cv00847 |
March 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT -The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of the respondent and against the petitioner. The petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/17/2020. Copy Mailed.(CKM) |
Filing 8 ORDER - It is clear from Mr. Holmess petition and his return to the show cause order that he has not exhausted his state court remedies. It is not clear whether his claims are now procedurally barred. Because Mr. Holmes may still be able to exhaust his state court remedies, his petition is dismissed without prejudice, which means that he may refile his petition after exhausting his state court remedies. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/17/2020. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE re #5 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner PATRICK HOLMES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) |
Filing 6 ORDER - denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The information provided with the motion demonstrates that the petitioner has sufficient funds in his prisoner trust account to pay the filing fee. The petitioner shall have through April 30, 2020, in which to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/1/2020. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The petitioner shall have through April 17, 2020, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The petitioner shall have through April 17, 2020, to show cause why this habeas petition should not be dismissed without prejudice for the petitioners failure to exhaust his state court remedies. Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2020. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/18/2020. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to the Court, filed by Petitioner PATRICK HOLMES (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (AAS) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner PATRICK HOLMES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by PATRICK HOLMES. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HOLMES v. STATE OF INDIANA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: PATRICK HOLMES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.