ROSS v. CARTER et al
| JASON EVERETT ROSS |
| ROBERT CARTER, JR., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY FOR IDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA |
| 1:2020cv00876 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MOTION Requesting Status of Case, filed by Plaintiff JASON EVERETT ROSS. (DWH)
|
|
Filing 20
Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet, filed by Plaintiff. Copy/Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Copy of Public Docket Sheet) (DWH)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION to Receive Status Update by Email, filed by Plaintiff JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
|
|
Filing 18
Letter regarding IFP Status from Jason Everett Ross. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
|
|
Filing 17
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Envelope). (MAC)
|
|
Filing 15
RECEIPT #IP069180 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $14.00, paid by Plaintiff. (REO)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for Extension of Time and to remove Habeas Claims, filed by Plaintiff JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
|
|
Filing 14
Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against ATTORNEY FOR IDOC, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA, ROBERT CARTER, JR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, filed by JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Miscellaneous documents, #2 Envelope)(NAD)
|
|
Filing 13
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JASON EVERETT ROSS. (NAD)
|
|
Filing 12
Letter from JASON EVERETT ROSS re Status of Filing Fee and Amended Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (NAD)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Forms and Motions, filed by Plaintiff JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(NAD)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Add Defendants, filed by Plaintiff JASON EVERETT ROSS. (NAD) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/20/2020: #1 Envelope) (NAD).
|
|
Filing 9
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fourteen Dollars and Zero Cents ($14.00). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through May 5, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Copy to Jason Everett Ross via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/9/2020. (JDH)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to #6 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDH)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JDH)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through April 24, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - On March 18, 2020, the Court received a letter from Jason Everett Ross addressed to the clerk. Dkt. 1. Mr. Rosss correspondence indicates his desire to bring a civil action identical to a prior case filed by other plaintiffs in this Court. The letter also indicates that Mr. Ross is being illegally jailed. In the absence of a better alternative, the letter was processed as a civil complaint. However, the letter does not constitute a complaint and does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is therefore dismissed. The plaintiff shall have through April 24, 2020, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Order should not issue or to file an amended complaint (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/23/2020. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 prisoner civil rights complaint form) (DWH)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JASON EVERETT ROSS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ATTORNEY FOR IDOC, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA, ROBERT CARTER, JR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, filed by JASON EVERETT ROSS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
