PARTLOW v. MILLER et al
Plaintiff: EDWARD PARTLOW
Defendant: AMANDA COPELAND, ARAMARK CORPORATION and BRANDON MILLER
Case Number: 1:2020cv01092
Filed: April 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - DENYING #7 MOTION TO WAIVE INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE. Edward Partlow's motion to waive his initial partial filing fee, dkt. #7 , is denied. An initial partial filing fee is warranted based on the average monthly deposits to Mr. Partlow's inmate trust account. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) (A). In fact, the exhibit attached to Mr. Partlow's motion shows that he currently has sufficient funds to pay his initial partial filing fee of $10.39. Dkt. 7-1. Mr. Partlow shall continue to have through June 5, 2020, to pay his initial partial filing fee as previously directed. See dkt. #8 . Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/12/2020. (NAD)
May 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #6 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Ten Dollars and Thirty-Nine Cents ($10.39). The plaintiff shall have through June 5, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/8/2020. (NAD)
May 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD PARTLOW. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Transaction History Inquiry)(NAD)
April 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD PARTLOW. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Transaction History Inquiry, #2 Exhibit Dkt. 5 Notice of Deficiency)(NAD)
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through May 18, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Attachments: #1 Form Motion for IFP) (MEH)
April 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC)
April 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
April 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ARAMARK CORPORATION, AMANDA COPELAND, BRANDON MILLER, filed by EDWARD PARTLOW. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO)
April 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by EDWARD PARTLOW located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by EDWARD PARTLOW to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PARTLOW v. MILLER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMANDA COPELAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRANDON MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDWARD PARTLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?