BALKAMP, INC. et al v. HARBOR INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
BALKAMP, INC. and GENUINE PARTS COMPANY |
HARBOR INDUSTRIES, INC., HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY and G.A. RICHARDS COMPANY |
1:2020cv01141 |
April 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela A. Paige on behalf of Defendant HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Paige, Pamela) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hendricks Circuit Court, case number 32C01-2003-PL-000038, filed by HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5953574) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Appearance, Complaint, Summons (Harbor), Summons (G.A. Richards), Summons (Hartford), Service Return (Hartford), Service Return (G.A. Richards), Service Return (Harbor), Appearance P. Devine, Appearance S. Zabaneh, Motion for EOT, Order, Appearance P. Paige, Motion for EOT, Order, Appearance J. Kalas, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit B - Underlying Complaint, #5 Exhibit C - Medical Records Produced in Underlying Action, #6 Exhibit D - Register of Actions from Underlying Action, #7 Exhibit E - Notice to Circuit Court of Filing of Removal)(Paige, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.