3M COMPANY v. PUZNAK et al
| 3M COMPANY |
| ZACHARY PUZNAK, John Doe 7, JOHN DOE 10, JOHN DOE 6, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 9, JOHN DOE 8, JOHN DOE 5, ZENGER LLC, JOHN DOE 4 and JOHN DOE 1 |
| 1:2020cv01287 |
| April 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Richard L Young |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis T. Perry on behalf of Plaintiff 3M COMPANY. (Perry, Louis) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M COMPANY. (Osborn, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathy Lynn Osborn on behalf of Plaintiff 3M COMPANY. (Osborn, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by 3M COMPANY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5975821) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 3M Press Release, #2 Exhibit 2 - 3M Publication, #3 Exhibit 3 - ZeroAqua webpage, #4 Exhibit 4 - April 14 Email, #5 Exhibit 5 - First April 24 Email, #6 Exhibit 6 - Second April 24 Email, #7 Exhibit 7 - LinkedIn post, #8 Exhibit 8 - GoFundMe page, #9 Exhibit 9 - 329 Registration, #10 Exhibit 10 - 534 Registration, #11 Exhibit 11 - 3M price list, #12 Exhibit 12 - 3M fraud report form, #13 Exhibit 13 - ZeroAqua Order page, #14 Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Proposed Summons)(Osborn, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
