POE v. DENISEN PARKING SERVICES
Plaintiff: MARSHA POE
Defendant: DENISEN PARKING SERVICES
Case Number: 1:2020cv01431
Filed: May 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2020 Filing 15 Amended MOTION Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Correct Case Caption, filed by Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Guthrie, Tiffany)
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 8/11/2020 at 10:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 7/7/2020.(JRB)
June 16, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Everton, Toni)
June 10, 2020 Filing 12 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by MARSHA POE. DENISEN PARKING SERVICES served on 5/26/2020. (Guthrie, Tiffany)
June 5, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Toni M. Everton on behalf of Defendant DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Everton, Toni)
June 5, 2020 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Wilson, Heather)
June 5, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather L. Wilson on behalf of Defendant DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Wilson, Heather)
May 22, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (JDH)
May 21, 2020 Filing 7 EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial by All Plaintiffs. (Guthrie, Tiffany)
May 19, 2020 Filing 6 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH)
May 19, 2020 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
May 18, 2020 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET, filed by Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Guthrie, Tiffany) Modified docket text on 5/19/2020 (JD).
May 18, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Darron S. Stewart on behalf of Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Stewart, Darron)
May 18, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tiffany Ruth Guthrie on behalf of Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Guthrie, Tiffany)
May 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against DENISEN PARKING SERVICES, filed by MARSHA POE. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5997520) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Guthrie, Tiffany)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: POE v. DENISEN PARKING SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DENISEN PARKING SERVICES
Represented By: Toni M. Everton
Represented By: Heather L. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARSHA POE
Represented By: Darron S. Stewart
Represented By: Tiffany Ruth Guthrie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?