POE v. DENISEN PARKING SERVICES
MARSHA POE |
DENISEN PARKING SERVICES |
1:2020cv01431 |
May 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Amended MOTION Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Correct Case Caption, filed by Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Guthrie, Tiffany) |
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 8/11/2020 at 10:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 7/7/2020.(JRB) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Everton, Toni) |
Filing 12 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by MARSHA POE. DENISEN PARKING SERVICES served on 5/26/2020. (Guthrie, Tiffany) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Toni M. Everton on behalf of Defendant DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Everton, Toni) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Wilson, Heather) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather L. Wilson on behalf of Defendant DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (Wilson, Heather) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to DENISEN PARKING SERVICES. (JDH) |
Filing 7 EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial by All Plaintiffs. (Guthrie, Tiffany) |
Filing 6 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET, filed by Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Guthrie, Tiffany) Modified docket text on 5/19/2020 (JD). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Darron S. Stewart on behalf of Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Stewart, Darron) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tiffany Ruth Guthrie on behalf of Plaintiff MARSHA POE. (Guthrie, Tiffany) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against DENISEN PARKING SERVICES, filed by MARSHA POE. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5997520) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Guthrie, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: POE v. DENISEN PARKING SERVICES | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DENISEN PARKING SERVICES | |
Represented By: | Toni M. Everton |
Represented By: | Heather L. Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MARSHA POE | |
Represented By: | Darron S. Stewart |
Represented By: | Tiffany Ruth Guthrie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.