MAIN v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Carole L Main and CAROLE L. MAIN |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. |
1:2020cv01570 |
June 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James R Sweeney |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Alan J. Stecklein on behalf of Plaintiff CAROLE L. MAIN. (Stecklein, Alan) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Craig Sanders for EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. added. Copy to Craig Sanders via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 7/14/2020. (SWM) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Attorney(s) Craig Sanders to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6073776), filed by Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Craig Sanders, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hughes, Logan) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC..(Hughes, Logan) |
Filing 13 Equifax Information Services' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and Affirmative Defenses, filed by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.(DeGroff, Christopher) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC identifying Corporate Parent EQUIFAX, INC. for EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.. (DeGroff, Christopher) |
Filing 11 NOTICE Notice of Automatic Initial Extension of Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Petition, filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC (DeGroff, Christopher) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Hughes, Logan) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. identifying Corporate Parent EXPERIAN PLC, Other Affiliate CENTRAL SOURCE LLC, Other Affiliate ONLINE DATA EXCHANGE LLC, Other Affiliate NEW MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC, Other Affiliate VANTAGESCORE SOLUTIONS LLC, Other Affiliate OPT-OUT SERVICES LLC for EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC... (Hughes, Logan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Logan C. Hughes on behalf of Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Hughes, Logan) |
Filing 7 Submission of State Court Record from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D11-2005-MI-015370.(DWH) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Plaintiff CAROLE L. MAIN. (Rapp, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael H. Rapp on behalf of Plaintiff CAROLE L. MAIN. (Rapp, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J. DeGroff on behalf of Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (DeGroff, Christopher) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC. (DeGroff, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Supreme Court, case number 49D11-2005-MI-015370, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6017416) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record, #3 Exhibit)(DeGroff, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.