DAVIS v. AHEPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.
| LINDA J DAVIS and LINDA J. DAVIS |
| AHEPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. |
| 1:2020cv01605 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant AHEPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.. (Couture, Amanda) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda C. Couture on behalf of Defendant AHEPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.. (Couture, Amanda) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to AHEPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sandra L. Blevins on behalf of Plaintiff LINDA J DAVIS. (Blevins, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jamie A. Maddox on behalf of Plaintiff LINDA J DAVIS. (Maddox, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AHEPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., filed by LINDA J DAVIS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6026425) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit 2 - Right to Sue, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons for AHEPA)(Maddox, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
